gogoblender 3,070 Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 It's almost strange how fast it is, in fact. It's been let out of the labs for test drives and is completely usable: http://www2.sandbox.google.com/ Here's a link to a site which has some nice info and rates google's latest toy: http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/ gogo Link to comment
soldats 0 Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 mehhh.... not impressed the speed of the search string 'sacred 2'....20 searches provided these avg's- new- .12 seconds old- .08 seconds accuracy...didn't notice a difference on the first page of results..second page differs ***interesting fact*** the sacredwiki appears on the second page of the old google search. it appears as the LAST result on the third page of the new search. the sif also appears sooner on the old vs. new. number of articles- new- Results 1 - 10 of about 17,100,000 for sacred 2. (0.11 seconds) old- Results 1 - 10 of about 13,100,000 for sacred 2. (0.09 seconds) didn't have time to check for relevancy...but on the quick test run, it seems that the old google is still faster and has slightly better results....as well as displaying online merchant links with prices at the bottom[foot] of each page, whereas the new google does not[perhaps not implimented yet?] Link to comment
the1youh8 0 Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 ive just compared it to the current google. I tested for speed. I searched britney spears in new google = 0.14 sec with the current google = .08 sec weird Link to comment
soldats 0 Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 it could be that the new google IS faster, though it has to check for more articles, which is reflected by the speed vs number of articles Link to comment
gogoblender 3,070 Posted August 13, 2009 Author Share Posted August 13, 2009 I'll run some compares too...as soon as it goes back up! gogo Link to comment
simbo 0 Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 I searched dark matters... old-61,000,000 results-0.13 seconds new-13,000,000 results-0.31 seconds hmmmm... Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now