Ysne58 236 Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 Here is another duplicate: http://www.sacredwiki.org/index.php5/Sacred_2:Guard_of_the_Order [Edit the Resurrection Oppoenent that appears on this page is actually from the Fallen Heroes quest and that quest enemy is already covered here: http://www.sacredwiki.org/index.php5/Sacred_2:Resurrection_Opponent]. http://www.sacredwiki.org/index.php5/Sacred_2:Order_of_the_Guard Edit no 2. Here is another one -- http://www.sacredwiki.org/index.php5/Sacred_2:Order_Guard This is a quest enemy for the Judriel and Romdreal chain quest. http://www.sacredwiki.org/index.php5/Sacred_2:Judriel_and_Romdreal I will double check the next time I am in game, but I'm pretty sure that quest enemy is called Guard of the Order. It looks like The Order of the Guard Page needs to go bye bye. http://www.sacredwiki.org/index.php5/Sacred_2:Order_of_the_Guard I still need to go through that chain and put the rest of those guards in the right places link wise. I plan to do that before I start tackling the Artamark links. Good Stuff Ysne. Deleted! I checked the page and saw that it was not linked to anything and also noticed on the Rescue Operation that it was linking to a different more relevant page; Order Guard. It did take me awhile to figure out what was going on there. I ran through the quest again and will get the other guards properly linked up. Link to comment
Ysne58 236 Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 This one is going to have to be fixed at some point. http://www.sacredwiki.org/index.php5/Sacred_2:Undead_-_Undead There are two quest enemies on this page that should each have its own. Undead - Disturbance of the Peace Undead - Orkish Necromancers Link to comment
Schot 407 Posted January 25, 2011 Author Share Posted January 25, 2011 Hmmm, that's curious. Maybe I was wrong about the naming for quest enemies with the same name. We should leave those alone for now. I'll ask Knuckles how it works. Link to comment
Ysne58 236 Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 (edited) Hmmm, that's curious. Maybe I was wrong about the naming for quest enemies with the same name. We should leave those alone for now. I'll ask Knuckles how it works. I have noticed that some of them have parenthesis, which I believe we are moving away from. One example is: http://www.sacredwiki.org/index.php5/Sacred_2:Guard The text says there are three guards that share the same name. There are four listings in the section. One of those listings says it is from two different quests. So there are a total of five quests referenced in that section. I did post earlier somewhere about this one. Edited January 25, 2011 by Ysne58 Link to comment
Schot 407 Posted January 25, 2011 Author Share Posted January 25, 2011 Ah good. That's a perfect reference page. It implies what I understood. That Quest Enemies of the same name get their own page names and that same name quest enemy pages are named like "Enemy Name - Quest Name". And you're right about parenthesis. We are moving away from parenthesis. In place of parenthesis we are using a hyphen between the Enemy Name - Quest Name instead. Link to comment
Ysne58 236 Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 Ah good. That's a perfect reference page. It implies what I understood. That Quest Enemies of the same name get their own page names and that same name quest enemy pages are named like "Enemy Name - Quest Name". And you're right about parenthesis. We are moving away from parenthesis. In place of parenthesis we are using a hyphen between the Enemy Name - Quest Name instead. I don't feel comfortable messing with quest enemy pages. Those will need to be fixed at some point. As will those two Undead - Undead quest enemies. Link to comment
Schot 407 Posted January 25, 2011 Author Share Posted January 25, 2011 No problem Ysne. Not a hurry. There's plenty to do. Link to comment
Ysne58 236 Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 No problem Ysne. Not a hurry. There's plenty to do. That is an understatement if I ever heard one. ROFL. Link to comment
Knuckles 904 Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 This one is going to have to be fixed at some point. http://www.sacredwik...Undead_-_Undead There are two quest enemies on this page that should each have its own. Undead - Disturbance of the Peace Undead - Orkish Necromancers This is named this way because if you just named it 'Undead' you would get the entire Undead section of the Bestiary. If the name has parenthesis, they can be changed but if it has an extra word (like the 2nd 'Undead') it was usually there to differentiate between something already named that somewhere else in wiki. Link to comment
Ysne58 236 Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 This one is going to have to be fixed at some point. http://www.sacredwik...Undead_-_Undead There are two quest enemies on this page that should each have its own. Undead - Disturbance of the Peace Undead - Orkish Necromancers This is named this way because if you just named it 'Undead' you would get the entire Undead section of the Bestiary. If the name has parenthesis, they can be changed but if it has an extra word (like the 2nd 'Undead') it was usually there to differentiate between something already named that somewhere else in wiki. I understand that Knuckles. Now that we have the new way of doing it, those two need to be changed at some point from undead - undead to the listing above in order to be consistent. Link to comment
gogoblender 3,073 Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 ysne, is there other things we can look at currently instead of all these name changes like schot mentioned? writeups and content addition is very important as there are huge gaps in the wiki. Just correcting what all of us here have already done is getting to be a lot of work, especially with all the constant re-reading this asks from me and schot to go over naming schemes. Theres so much content we want to add, and it seems like w'ere getting caught up in the motes. gogo Link to comment
Ysne58 236 Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 ysne, is there other things we can look at currently instead of all these name changes like schot mentioned? writeups and content addition is very important as there are huge gaps in the wiki. Just correcting what all of us here have already done is getting to be a lot of work, especially with all the constant re-reading this asks from me and schot to go over naming schemes. Theres so much content we want to add, and it seems like w'ere getting caught up in the motes. gogo I'm not saying this has to be done now. This is as good a place as any to keep track though when someone does have time to come back to it. Link to comment
Silver_fox 397 Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 How about moving the page named 'Sacred 2:In Accordance with Nature (Shadow)' (link: http://www.sacredwiki.org/index.php5/Sacred_2:In_Accordance_with_Nature_(Shadow) ) to the one named 'Sacred 2:In Accordance with Nature - Shadow', since we decided to use this naming system for the shadow quests. I've prepared all links already, so the page is ready to move. Link to comment
Ysne58 236 Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 I found another duplicate: I think that this one should be the one that goes bye bye.: http://www.sacredwiki.org/index.php5/Sacred_2:High_Elf_Inquistion_Guard This is the one that follows the current rule and should stay: http://www.sacredwiki.org/index.php5/Sacred_2:Inquisition_Guard_-_The_Moneylender Link to comment
Schot 407 Posted January 25, 2011 Author Share Posted January 25, 2011 Thanx ladies! Done and done. Temporarly closing this topic. gogo and I are having a hard time keeping up so for today we're going to take a break from page name requests. There's a lot gogo and I need to catch up on today. When I re-open this topic tomorrow I will have created a list of requirements for eidtors submitting requests. Nothing fancy. Just to help us fulfill rename requests more efficiently and in a way that will allow us to tend to our duties as well as this topic. P.s. Please don't ask, (or suggest, imply! lol), for a rename request in another topic today. We need a break. ^^ Link to comment
Recommended Posts